View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 20th January 2006, 09:40 PM
thelawnet thelawnet is offline
Knave of Hearts
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 684
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 16
Thanked 133 Times in 66 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 858
Rep Power: 22
thelawnet is a splendid one to beholdthelawnet is a splendid one to beholdthelawnet is a splendid one to beholdthelawnet is a splendid one to beholdthelawnet is a splendid one to beholdthelawnet is a splendid one to beholdthelawnet is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by caruso
From the point of strict letter-of-the-law the casino has its ass covered, because the "exclusion" clause is listed. Obviously, the whole thing is specifically engineered to hoodwink even a sharp player into missing it, by listing apparently clear terms on the bonus page, and burying the vital exclusion clause deep in a practically unreadable and seemingly irrelevant "user end agreement". These are shabby, underhand tactics, obviously designed to ensure that anyone taking a bonus at the Tropez group will be unable to cash out a win, otherwise they would simply list the exclusions on the bonus page.
They appear to have added it now, at least on Vegas Red. http://www.vegasred.com/bonus.html

This seems to be an admission that it wasn't fair to confiscate money under the old terms, otherwise they wouldn't have added it.