View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16th January 2006, 01:16 PM
caruso caruso is offline
Banned User - repetitive violations of posting rule 1.6
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,674
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 141 Times in 63 Posts
Reputation Points: 0
Rep Power: 0
caruso seems to be zero at this point
I'm pleased to see the quasi-responsible response from the Playtech "disputes" department.

Not that it needs saying, but I'll say it anyway: they can see all the "patterns" they want, and deny you subsequent deals / bar you etc on that basis, but since no rules violation was committed, they payout on the agreed contract first.

These Playtech issues are becoming ridiculous. There has to be a point at which Playtech is considered a rogue provider; quasi-responsibility of this disputes department response notwithstanding, their licensees evidently have a free card to do absolutely anything. The only way around this is to issue a general caution against Playtech casinos. They HAVE to be pushed into taking a stance against these rogue licensees.

The current list:

Giant Vegas
Vegas Red
Grand Banks
Joyland
Tropez / Swiss
African Palace
Indio

This is a software provider with no control over its licensees.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to caruso For This Useful Post:
jen (3rd February 2006), pepermintpatty (17th January 2006), Pinababy69 (16th January 2006)