View Single Post
Old 9th December 2005, 11:11 AM
scrollock scrollock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: boro, uk
Posts: 551
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 23
Thanked 28 Times in 15 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 209
Rep Power: 23
scrollock is very cool!scrollock is very cool!scrollock is very cool!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon-Jon
. All I can say is that there are three accounts with exactly the same play, opened on the same day (along with other warning signs that they employ wrt fraud) and that is reason enough. The casino was also kind enough to refund any money and offer another free bonus.
Hmm, thats sounds very much like the excuse golden palace used some time back to try and screw a load of players, i.e. accounts opened in the same time frame, similar styles of play.

the similar styles of play were simply "sticky bonus tactics", only problem was that this "fraud" gang was a worldwide conspiracy and its members were spread from the UK,germany and australia.

(along with other warning signs that they employ wrt fraud) and that is reason enough

this sounds like the casino is guessing there is fraud going on using circumstantial evidence, rather than having actual evidence or proof.

if there really is fraud going on, why are you giving him another bonus, if he is a fraudster, you lock him out and tell him never to come back!

if this guy is a fraudster, then hes not a good one, hes played an excluded game (allowed, although does not to WR), there is an advantage to playing these games even though they dont count to the WR (which is why some casinos will void any winnings if they are played at all).

so if he astute to know this and the advantage entailed in doing this, i find it unlikely that he would chose to use roulette when BJ was available under the same conditions, with a fraction of the house edge of roullette
Reply With Quote