I think a decent definition of low-risk is needed. I can understand someone betting red/black in roulette or bank/player in baccarrat being considered a low-risk wagerer, but $100/hand in
VP? Honestly. The standard deviation for that has to be huge. Regardless, using low-risk wagers is not grounds for stealing winnings. If a player complied with the T&C, they need to be paid. And saying "We can do what we feel like cause we said we could in the T&C" is always bad.
I wasn't affected by this problem, but it is a huge black mark to me for both Playtech and Crown Solutions. I have had nothing but positive experiences from both up until this point. I don't want to go near a playtech until Joyland pays out this money.
Count me in on a total Playtech boycott.
Freakin