|
Assuming you and the other accused player agree, there is no excuse why they shouldn't provide hand histories with both your and his hands exposed.
A third party could look at those histories, and while that can't prove that you two weren't sharing information about hole cards, it should be able to at least show that you weren't colluding in betting.
Of course if they still feel your colluding, I'm sure they are going to take the money they froze and distribute it to those players you won it from, not just keep it themselves, right? Haha.
Good luck.
|