View Single Post
Old 28th May 2004, 07:52 AM
rowmare's Avatar
rowmare rowmare is offline
WebMeister
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 328
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 101
Thanked 118 Times in 40 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 730
Rep Power: 30
rowmare is a splendid one to beholdrowmare is a splendid one to beholdrowmare is a splendid one to beholdrowmare is a splendid one to beholdrowmare is a splendid one to beholdrowmare is a splendid one to beholdrowmare is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via MSN to rowmare
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw2003
There might be a big difference legally. In terms of public opinion, why
would they pay somebody if they are faultless!

To save many more millions of dollars in legal costs than settling would cost. It is very common that a very large company will settle out of court, whether guilty or not, just to save time and money.

Also, a long and drawn-out legal battle does more to shred a company's reputation - even when innocent (you know how the press is), than a settlement.

Don't you people read John Grisham?
__________________
Janet / Fergie
Reply With Quote