View Single Post
Old 4th December 2008, 12:37 AM
vinylweatherman's Avatar
vinylweatherman vinylweatherman is offline
RAMming speed Capt'n
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 6,378
WTGs: 26
WTGd at 364 Times in 38 Posts
Thanks: 286
Thanked 3,918 Times in 2,088 Posts
Nominated 51 Times in 33 Posts
Nominated TOTW/F/M Award(s): 1
Reputation Points: 21172
Rep Power: 157
vinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond repute
I played a bit of Blackjack, and the dealer just kept on getting 21 on many "bad" up cards. At the same time, I REPEATEDLY kept busting on 22 - odd really. I would hit a load of low cards to about 14 or so, then hit a bust card that took me to 22.

I don't think I should hit 22 that often, why not 24 or 25 - should be equally likely. Why 21 for the dealer, and not 19, 22, or 23.

Also, a very large proportion of PUSH results on my stands on 19 and 20.

I made a brief note from the session.

21 (Dealer - 7.15%) (Me 4.55%)
20 (Dealer - 17.5%) (Me 16.25%)
BUST (Dealer - 21.7%) - now this IS odd, since the dealer MUST HIT hands such as hard 16 or less, whereas I can stand and hope for the dealer to bust).

This looks like one of those long "streak" events, with a long series of hands all following this pattern.

3 Card Poker was just as bad, I was rarely getting so much as Q,6,4 - or more than low pairs - the dealer was constantly getting K and A high, pairs, flushes and straights. The dealer also seems to get more of the 3OK and straight flush hands than the player - but surely these should be equally distributed. Again - streak behaviour, not "flat" random outcomes.

The RTP of the SLOTS far exceeded the RTP of the above games, which supposedly have a much lower house edge.

In VP - many of my "wins" turn out to be a "push", with 2 pair seeming NEVER to produce a full house. This is very unlike how it used to be, with plenty of 4OK turning up, even though higher hands were equally rare then as now. Again, this seems to show games sitting in a rut, good or bad, rather than producing an even distribution of random results.
Hit a game that is "on streak", and the wins fly in, and seems equally unreal, but in a nice way. With SO MANY new games having been released though, it is much harder now to find the few that are paying well.

The overwhelming number of players reporting that things have changed for the worse seems to make it more likely that indeed something HAS been changed, rather than that 1000 players have suddenly fallen victim to an affliction of the mind.
__________________
Full Fruity ahoy capt'n
Boarding party at the ready.
ATTACK!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vinylweatherman For This Useful Post:
Alexishot69 (4th December 2008), Fleur-De-Lis (4th December 2008), retlaw (4th December 2008)