View Single Post
Old 27th November 2008, 01:59 AM
aka23's Avatar
aka23 aka23 is offline
Webmeister
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,232
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 27
Thanked 434 Times in 293 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 2317
Rep Power: 31
aka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond reputeaka23 has a reputation beyond repute
If a casino were to cheat, I doubt it would have anything to do with a faulty RNG. It would be unnecessarily awkward to change to the core RNG. Instead it's more an issue of how the RNG is used or not used. For example, a software provider could manipulate a blackjack game by programming the software to draw a random card from the deck (using RNG), then discard that card if it caused a dealer bust and draw a new random card (using RNG). A software could also make the outcome of a BJ game like a weighted slot, instead of a deck of cards. The weighted slot would still use a fair RNG, but it wouldn't play like a deck of cards.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aka23 For This Useful Post:
Shocked (27th November 2008)