Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandMaster
It seems that the "fairest blackjack" has all to do with you winning. With this sort of numbers you should start worrying that it might be biassed in favour of the player.  |
Well, the overall winning hand percentage is about 43% which is the norm for blackjack. But it may have something to do with my method of playing as explained below.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EasyRhino
Bowl, are you requesting the entire cashout in a lump sum? And via what method? I don't recommend doing a lick of playing until you get paid.
Also, out of curiosity, where you using some sort of really aggressive positive progression betting? Or just had an absurdl lucky streak?
|
Well, yeah, I requested to withdrawal my balance but I assume that by default they would pay $5,000 at a time (as stated in T&C). I didn't think I needed to do multiple withdrawal requests of $5,000 each.
I wrote this on another forum: As far as "how" I did it, yes, I did use a modified Martingale progression. It's the basis of how I play. I achieve a winning hand first, then I do a martingale bet. I depend on winning at least two hands in a row within a session, you know, back to back wins. But too many lone wins can martingale you to the maximum bet limit. And there isn't much manueuver room when you are betting the max. That is how I lost a number of times over $1500 in a session. But also when you get those sessions where you are winning over 60% of your hands, my! those maximum bets add up! Scary ride though!
