View Single Post
Old 28th September 2008, 11:06 PM
Pinababy69's Avatar
Pinababy69 Pinababy69 is offline
Crusader
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario - Canada
Posts: 3,623
WTGs: 15
WTGd at 93 Times in 14 Posts
Thanks: 4,123
Thanked 3,367 Times in 1,537 Posts
Nominated 70 Times in 27 Posts
Nominated TOTW/F/M Award(s): 2
Reputation Points: 18497
Rep Power: 131
Pinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond repute
You are very right Ferrett. Between this case and the case of Alderney originally ruling against the complainant in the Poker.com case, these are very disturbing precedents being set by supposed regulatory authorities.

Bryan and/or Max.....any news on this at all?
Reply With Quote