Quote:
Originally Posted by winbig
IMO, they're already getting this reputation, if not for the other problems they're having, but for having such predatory T&C's. Only rogues stick a "no autoplay" term in their rules; not to mention the others.
|
This is a "Casino Rewards" term, which is why I questioned whether this was a Casino Rewards related brand when they launched. They were also said to be a Grand Prive brand as they had "Agent Jane Blonde" slot, and Grand Prive themselves list this game as being "exclusive to Grand Prive"
They are listed here as an independent, but recent developments in the "no pay" thread have their CS admitting that they "share information with other casinos", in other words, there is a "central blacklist" that Red Flush subscribes to, which is shared between an unspecified group of otherwise independent casinos. Players seem to have NO RIGHT to see what this list holds about them, nor, or course, the right to have any incorrect information held about them corrected. If this were a UK based company, this would NOT be allowed, as we would have a right to see the information held about us, and have anything that can be shown to be wrong removed or corrected.
It seems there are a number of these blacklists around, which the software providers deny existence of, yet clearly they exist in some form - just that the software providers themselves do not operate them, thus giving them the ability to deny any knowledge of them.