Quote:
Originally Posted by paul02085
" RTG controls the % settings, not the casino as some widely assume, and a casino has to request a change, justify it to RTG, then wait for around 4-6 months for it to be applied - if it is considered justified (don't ask me how they decide!!)."
If this is true i am sure it is only if they want to raise the payout %, not lower it. Its laughable to think that Michael Staw would require justification to lower payout %'s with his past actions "running" RTG. |
I recall Inet stating their payout % is set at 95% although I am amused as to how I cannot reach even 50% of their WRs consistently for the Tuesday coupon at CM and low rolling at 0.20 per spin
As for
RTG itself, I dont trust them much especially since they distance themself from player issues, control % settings and if Inet is to be believed wont even supply me with the House Way for setting Paigow Poker (implying something to hide or incompetent?).
In another thread, I said I was not pleased with the outcomes of Baccarat games at Inet. I have played a total 122 hands, winning 50 (I always bet on Banker), losing 62 and tying 10 times. Payout is slightly less than 80%. The sample size is small but tilted heavily in favor of the casino but I dont have enough funds to try out a large samle. Given
RTG's ability to set % in slots, I am inclined to believe they might be able to set the % in table games as well.
As for Inetbet, I am disappointed at their indifferent attitude whenever some concerns or complaints are raised especially in the last year or so. If you have adverse comments on them in this forum, they are unhappy about it and tell you it shouldnt say these things in public. If you write to them, their replies just make you sick. Frankly, other than paying out promptly, they are simply at the bottom of the league when it comes to customer service so why bother with this casino. I hope Rushmore accepts MB soon so that couple with Club World, I can have at least 2 casinos to patronize.