View Single Post
Old 15th June 2008, 08:21 AM
Roar Roar is offline
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 79
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 27 Times in 15 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 90
Rep Power: 8
Roar has been spending a lot of time in the forum
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelawnet View Post
He's quite entitled to use the strategy card, but doing something which is contrary to the rules or law is just wrong.
The rules compel the Casino to behave and demonstrate a commitment to 'Responsible Gaming'. Period. The debate as to what exactly constitutes 'Responsible Gaming' in a online context is valid.

A 'bot' simply mimics a player consulting a BJ strategy card. It is not a magic wand that can touch cards and turn them into a BlackJack at will. A 'bot' can not sprinkle fairy dust across a blackjack table and cause the house to bust.

A 'bot' does not interfere with the normal operation of the game in any way, shape or form.

The prohibition on 'bot' play seeks to do just that.

If a player repeatedly deposits and loses large sums of money the Casino does not send him to Gamblers Anonymous - they send him a bonus.

>
Reply With Quote