View Single Post
Old 12th June 2008, 05:31 PM
Roar Roar is offline
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 79
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 6
Thanked 27 Times in 15 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 90
Rep Power: 8
Roar has been spending a lot of time in the forum
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komodo View Post
You beat the game with bot+bonus. Anything unclear?
Just the bonus wont help, since you still have to do all the work.
The bot is not innocent, since it does all the work and also employs optimal strategy which you probably dont.

You can beat the game with a bonus and no 'bot'.

You can beat the game with a bonus and a 'bot'.

You can NOT beat a game without a bonus playing with a 'bot'.

You can NOT beat a game without a bonus or a 'bot'.


We don't need Columbo to detect the culprit.

There seems to be a consensus building that playing without a 'bot' will render the life of online players a little more miserable inasmuch they will suffer a higher rate of loss.

The rhetorical question that comes to mind is to what extent does the prohibition of 'bots' fulfill the Casinos obligation toward 'Responsible Gambling'?

Does the 'Responsible Gambling' charter, to which BetFair are apparently fully committed, seek to reduce an individuals propensity to loss? To what extent does the prohibition on 'bot' play promote 'Responsible Gambling' and likewise reduce an individuals propensity to financial loss?

Seems to me the prohibition of 'bots' is all about increasing the chances of loss in direct contradiction to the objectives contained within so called 'Responsible Gambling'.

>
Reply With Quote