Quote:
Originally Posted by praytech
If you are a moderator, why are you wading into this debate, instead of 'moderating' ?
|

Actually I don't think I was debating anything, I was just trying to bring a little perspective to the scene. Please notice that I didn't say anything about the validity of your request to KS to cough up some data for you, I was just trying to remind you that gamblers have swings and it could well be the case that you're on one of them. Maybe, maybe not, but if you re-read my post with a beer in your hand instead of a hatchet you might see that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by praytech
As you say, you failed statistics, so that sort of discounts any input you might have ...
|
Actually you might want to have a look at that again. I said I failed it 'the first time'. I did quite nicely on the second go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by praytech
And when did I even say that $0 end sum was proof of a rigged game? I NEVER said that, so I would appreciate it if you don't put words in my mouth.
|
Having just re-read your posts I think I'm quite comfortable in stating that that's virtually all you have been saying. Statements like "I have actually never come across a casino where the odds are so stacked against a player" have formed the bulk of your contribution here and it's hard to read things like that any other way.
You're entitled to your opinion of course but my point was and is that your opinion seems more about your rage at losing than anything else. Hence I don't see that I was putting words in your mouth at all, merely highlighting and underscoring what you've already said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by praytech
Are you also telling me that if a player suspects that the games may be rigged, he should just say nothing, and let other players lose thousands of dollars to the same operator?
|
You don't know much about my work here do you? Have a look at the
Past PABs and you'll have a good idea how misplaced your question really is. The PABs since December have been the bulk of my work here at Casinomeister.
Quote:
Originally Posted by praytech
I don't think that it helps Casinomeister to go on the attack like Max did ...
|
Again, I suggest you read those posts a little closer. You're doing the attacking sweat-pea, not me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by praytech
He has waded in to this debate, which is about my personal experience with a rogue operator, in a manner that is not helping this situation, but merely having the effect of tarnishing my rep in this regard.
|
(a) Just to be clear, KS is not officially a 'rogue casino' at this time. You're obviously not liking how thing's have gone for you there but that doesn't make them Rogue. (b) Your 'rep' was plenty tarnished by your highly inappropriate use of our forums from the get-go, for which you've made no apology as I recall, not to mention your in-your-face approach to this discussion since. I can't see that I've done anything to worsen that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casinomeister
Max ... has an interest to do the job he gets paid for which is to moderate the complaints section in this forum.
|
An excellent point, which I'll take as a queue to abandon my attempt to help settle praytech's mind and recognize that I will find my time better spent elsewhere at Casinomeister today.