Quote:
Originally Posted by vinylweatherman
If the depositor had WON with the $650, I am sure BoDog would not have paid out anyway, as they would then realise it was a fraudulent account. Funny how they can only recognise one when a player wins, but will not find an account fraudulent when a player loses, even if they are told it is, and backed up by police and bank evidence. This seems to apply to many casinos, and shows that they are not being entirely truthful about their supposedly excellent ability to correctly differentiate between legitimate accounts, and fraudulent ones.
|
This goes right to the heart of the matter being discussed in a seperate thread about how a casino is requesting notarised docs before paying on a cashout. I am sick and tired of how most online casinos write their own self-serving rules; you can believe that their version is wholly based on their own bottom-line profit, not on any basis of fairness towards the player.
As far as Bodog itself goes, I would never recomend that anyone play there, as my own personal experience shows that they are only interested in padding their bottom line; before I swore off
RTG casinos I put over 3k in the site over several months and lost it all without a withdrawl (on slots at 20 & 40 cents a pull). When I asked them for a comp, they reminded me that I had received a "bonus" of 10% on my deposits and refused. Never mind that I totally took it up the butt on my actual game play. I guess $3000 is just small potatoes to an outfit their size.
The fact that Bodog is "good to go"
per the casinomeister
RTG list just shows how pathetic
RTG is overall...