Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan Disorder
I agree. What is normal in these cases? I am not altogether convinced that the LGA are treating this matter seriously. Have they made up their mind already and are just ignoring the players?
The LGA are regarded as a trustworthy name in Internet gambling. This performance does not instil confidence.
|
I am having to agree with this. It appears that nothing will come of this, players are completely in the dark about what, if anything, is happening. If this is "normal", then it hardly inspires confidence that the LGA have player's interests high on the agenda.
This will serve to undermine their credibilty, and will devalue their value as perceived protection for players from industry rogues. I seem to recall Kahnawake going down the same route when it came to dealing with player issues, and their credibility has been steadily eroded, and only now have they decided to change after the UK Gambling Board rejected their application for a place on the Whitelist, a rebuttal that could cost them a lot of future revenue (strangely, that is what seems to have got their attention, although many still think they haven't done enough given their handling of the Absolute Poker scandal).