View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 9th May 2008, 07:07 PM
vinylweatherman's Avatar
vinylweatherman vinylweatherman is offline
See Left
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,405
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 34 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 191
Thanked 2,657 Times in 1,379 Posts
Reputation Points: 13930
Rep Power: 107
vinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey1972 View Post
Well, I lost $200 on the initial sign up bonus, but I did get paid for the first free chip, which I did win. I feel pretty happy about that. So I figured to keep on trying. Why not push my luck with this casino, as there are so many?

Also, I felt that I could help somebody else exploit their multiple free chip offers. Since they are obviously rogues, it gives me shcaedenfreude (sp?) if someone else can win. Let's see if someone else deposits $25 in between and gets away with it. I'm still pretty sure that even if I had deposited $25, they wouldn't have paid me. That was just a lame excuse. Let's see if someone else can test that.
It won't work. This is a DELIBERATE trap set by them. They KNOW this offer is full of holes and easy to exploit, so they KNOW at what point to pay up, and at what point to pull the plug. Had you deposited $25 instead of $5, and got ahead overall, they would have simply plucked another rule out of the air, such as "the intervening deposit must be at least as much as the free chip claimed before it, and as you only deposited $25 your withdrawal was refused". NOT having any specifics as to what constitutes a deposit of "real money" allows them to pull a non-payment stunt on a whim.
A REPUTABLE casino would have the same kind of rule, but they would state exactly what they meant by an intervening deposit, and they would expect an amount similar to the size of free chips generally offered, so if $50 was generally the size of free chip, a fair deposit would be $50.

Although there are many ways to advantage play the kinds of colossal bonuses offered by the "Queen of Rogue City", you have to trust that you get paid, and it seems that losers overall have no problem getting paid (so that they deposit again), but as soon as you are ahead overall, you will run into every excuse in the book for not paying.
The fact that their offers are just SO ABUSABLE and FREQUENT, yet they are still in business, shows just how widespread their rogue behaviour is.
__________________
http://www.vinylweatherman.net

The woefully out of date guide to Fruit Machines on the UK Motorway network.
Reply With Quote