View Single Post
Old 17th April 2008, 03:04 PM
SlotsWizard SlotsWizard is offline
Webmeister
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 1,658
WTGs: 5
WTGd at 48 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 1,664
Thanked 1,558 Times in 774 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 8259
Rep Power: 64
SlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond repute
I think the winner's story would be more believable if not for this...

Quote:
Mrs Sexton claims they had made a variation on the agreement in October 2006, deciding that any payment over £1,000 did not need to be shared.
...which proves that there was some sort of agreement. On the other hand, one of the sisters' argument is equally weak:

Quote:
We always thought it was a binding agreement between three sisters.
It will be interesting to see how it turns out.
Reply With Quote