View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 21st March 2008, 10:15 AM
jetset's Avatar
jetset jetset is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,251
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 823
Thanked 2,733 Times in 1,323 Posts
Reputation Points: 14604
Rep Power: 155
jetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond repute
Back to the drawing board....

MASS. HOUSE REJECTS CASINO PLAN (Update)

Six hour debate culminates in a defeat (for now) for the Governor

Already burdened with a 'not recommended' tag from the Massachusetts legislature's Joint Committee on Economic Development, a bill proposing the introduction of three resort-style land casinos in the state was effectively rejected in a House of Representatives vote this week. The proposal, put forward by Governor Deval Patrick, included a clause seeking to ban Internet gambling.

After an impassioned six-hour debate, representatives voted 106-48 to send the bill to a study committee, effectively defeating the measure and ensuring it won't come back up for debate until next year at the earliest, reports Associated Press.

House Speaker Sal DiMasi engineered a pivotal committee vote against the bill. After the vote, he said "big money special interests lost," while the people of Massachusetts won.

Patrick predicted the casinos would have generated $400 million in annual tax revenue.

Robert Haynes, Massachusetts president of the AFL-CIO and a supporter of the bill, says he's profoundly disappointed in the vote and in the process.
__________________
jetset
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post:
just play (21st March 2008)