Thread: b4playing
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 24th December 2007, 12:05 AM
swampwitch's Avatar
swampwitch swampwitch is offline
Lizard Queen
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Iowa, dammit.
Posts: 262
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 338
Thanked 279 Times in 113 Posts
Reputation Points: 1576
Rep Power: 32
swampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant futureswampwitch has a brilliant future
The b4playing model was and is at best a con...on both honest affiliates and bonus players alike.
The very nature of the thing is designed to steal the livelihood of professional affiliates, and turn the boderline honest/not honest affiliate straight to the dark side. An affiliate gets $50 or $20 per player, and that is it. No commission on the life of the player...a fast buck and a license to co-opt other affiliates' players.

And for the players...
Quote:
the casinos themselves will not want to see players pushed from one casino to the next for bonuses (someone also suggested players might get labelled as bonus abusers)
Simmo's got it.
It also keeps the player at arms length from the affiliate...What is the affiliate's incentive to arbitrate for the player if the affiliate's already pocketed the sad little $50...the only monies that affiliate will ever see from that player (Except for the concept of common decency. I know, I made a funny.)?

So Felix, as a professional in this business, why on earth would you have thrown your lot in with a company whose very business model is so anti-honest-affiliate friendly and anti-player friendly? Why would you expect to be treated fairly by people like this?
Reply With Quote