View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11th December 2007, 02:58 AM
vinylweatherman's Avatar
vinylweatherman vinylweatherman is offline
See Left
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,504
WTGs: 1
WTGd at 52 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 199
Thanked 2,755 Times in 1,423 Posts
Reputation Points: 14425
Rep Power: 111
vinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond reputevinylweatherman has a reputation beyond repute
I am still getting them, the format changes, but all are for Spin Palace.
It seems they are unable to trace and stop these affiliates.

In another thread, I highlighted that I have now received spam for one of the Playshare "white label" casino. How are we to believe that Mario will have any more success in stopping this than Palace Group.

Terms forbidding affiliates from spamming are of no use whatsoever if they cannot be enforced. So long as affiliates are able to get away with not having these "no spam" rules enforced, they will continue to spam like hell, knowing that a tiny percentage of a huge volume of sent E-mails is all they need to make more than they ever could through "honest" marketing.

Even reporting the spam does nothing, this has been repeatedly done with Palace Group, but the spam onslaught continues unabated. Eventually, it will be Spin Palace itself that finds it generates so many complaints from non-gamblers that the big ISP's will add them to the list of "bad domains" and this will make it much harder for both the casino and legitimate players to communicate effectively. One only has to see the problems with AOL,who are rather trigger happy when it comes to acting on complaints about spam. Just as with Casinomeister, I expect AOL are getting complaints about all these casinos apparently sending out huge volumes of spam, and will act in the same way as they did with Casinomeister, which has lead to to expulsion of all members here with AOL E-mail addresses (unless they register another non-AOL alternative).

If the spammers are actually making money from players gained through the spam, then the casinos have it in their power to put a stop to it by cutting the flow of revenue. If the spammers are doing it without any reward, the question must be "Why?".
__________________
http://www.vinylweatherman.net

The woefully out of date guide to Fruit Machines on the UK Motorway network.
Reply With Quote