View Single Post
Old 3rd November 2007, 04:30 AM
pokeraddict's Avatar
pokeraddict pokeraddict is offline
Webmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 1,566
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 174
Thanked 602 Times in 295 Posts
Nominated 2 Times in 2 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3353
Rep Power: 53
pokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
I guess I'm making the assumption that they are trying to be a news site that serves the community rather than just a spin room for their paymasters.
This is exactly right, nothing but gossip and disguised spam from their advertisers. They do have some use though as they seem to be able to get the scoop before others.

It is no surprise they would brong back AP. I'm surprised they took them down to begin with. They have never removed very low grade sportsbooks. They actively promote Sportsbook.com and family when they are in the middle of their own scandal. In fact the top 4 sportsbooks on their sportsbook page are all graded D+ or worse. Why should it surprise anyone they would put AP back?

I've said it plenty of times this year. AP is a rogue, they were a rogue before this ever happened. They lied to affiliates and players time and time again long before they got caught cheating their players. Even if the cheating was their only offense in the last year it would be hard to trust them but their constant lying about the scandal and all the issues earlier this year leaves their reputation as being complete liars. There is no way giving half ass responses and coverups is a step in the right direction.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pokeraddict For This Useful Post:
Keyser (4th November 2007), peteyweestro (3rd November 2007)