View Single Post
Old 2nd November 2007, 06:32 AM
Keyser Keyser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 32
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 169
Thanked 47 Times in 13 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 245
Rep Power: 15
Keyser is very cool!Keyser is very cool!Keyser is very cool!
Irresponsible

This is an extremely irresponsible decision and reeks of greed. In fact, the press release itself says that it is a lucrative deal for the website. It can't be any clearer than that.

A responsible website would wait until the external investigation was completed, digest the findings, wait until AP made changes to their business practices and software in response to the findings, then institue a probation period, and only after a successful probation period consider reinstating an endorsement.

A greedy website takes the cash without even waiting to find out the full story, is satisfied with some vague "rogue consultant" explanation, and not bother to even ask what changes have been implemented to prevent such occurences in the future.
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Keyser For This Useful Post:
Casinomeister  (6th November 2007), jenn1381 (3rd November 2007), jetset (2nd November 2007), jod5413 (3rd November 2007), peteyweestro (2nd November 2007), PurpleZelda (2nd November 2007)