Yes, and Playtech really responded well in the Action Online saga - only took them 4 months to decide that as no-one would reply they might have a problem. They did, they had gone bust some 4 months previously, and were at first ILLEGALLY attempting to trade themselves out of bankruptcy by advertising and taking new deposits while being unable to pay their creditors (mostly players withdrawals).
This shows to us the exacting standards that Playtech aspire to. They might act more quickly if their fees were unpaid. Worse than this, there is nothing in place to compensate players where casinos go bust, Microgaming have a fund in place, and this concentrates their minds when it comes to the behaviour of the operators, as they could end up footing the bill. Microgaming complaints tend to be about bonuses, not about total thievery as with some
RTG's and a couple of the worst Playtechs.
The likes of Maxima are "evil" because they send lying spam offers that they have every intention of not paying out on if they can find a reason not to, they therefore ENCOURAGE, and MARKET FOR the very "advantage" players they, as operators, complain just come along because "someone" might have posted an advantage scheme on some "evil" (Dutch?
) bonus abuser's forum and they have been screwed.
I am now a VIP at Maxima, and qualify for a VIP $1000 bonus, pity I don't have an account with them