View Single Post
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 18th October 2007, 11:13 AM
pokeraddict's Avatar
pokeraddict pokeraddict is online now
Webmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 1,411
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 138
Thanked 468 Times in 236 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 2668
Rep Power: 46
pokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond repute
One of the ways I see AP coming out of this is to include a well known player in the community to be involved in not only the audit process but allowed access in the future. This would include people that helped blow the whistle on this and did all the research that show they know what they are doing when it comes to investigating stuff like this. I don't know how they could pull it off without an "AP bought off x poster" but there must be some way to involve the community in this and allow a community rep or reps to ask questions directly to AP along side the auditor. Nat comes to mind since he seems to have really cracked this one and has earned tremendous respect but there are certainly several others. It might be the only way the community will ever rest from this disaster for online poker.
Reply With Quote