View Single Post
  #148 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 08:11 PM
Pinababy69's Avatar
Pinababy69 Pinababy69 is offline
Crusader
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,857
WTGs: 4
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2,548
Thanked 2,073 Times in 1,058 Posts
Nominated 10 Times in 2 Posts
Nominated TOTW/F/M Award(s): 1
Reputation Points: 11380
Rep Power: 87
Pinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by WholeBean View Post
the accused accounts have lost money intentionally to random opponents,
That is the definition of chip dumping, is it not? When you lose money INTENTIONALLY, you are dumping.

In any event, the chip dumping is only a part of the story. There was fraud/cheating going on prior to the chip dumping. The theory is that they then went and lost intentionally to try and "cover up" what they had done. I've seen the hand histories that were posted...it was chip dumping, no two ways about it.

Edit: Sorry Wholebean, I just read your above post. The chips may not have been obtained via a fraudulent payment method ie. credit card. BUT, they were certainly obtained by fraudulent play. Of course, if you're a non-believer that these accounts cheated at all....I guess that won't fly for you.
__________________
I'll promise to be nicer, if you'll promise to be smarter.