View Single Post
  #131 (permalink)  
Old 22nd September 2007, 09:20 AM
pokeraddict's Avatar
pokeraddict pokeraddict is offline
Webmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 1,411
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 138
Thanked 468 Times in 236 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 2668
Rep Power: 46
pokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond repute
More food for thought, I also posted this at 2+2 (with typo fixed):

Here is a piece of the puzzle I don't get.

Obviously the cheats know they got caught, either by 2+2, AP or both. Even if AP was not in on it if the funds were confiscated then they are in on it now. One of the following happened:

1. AP let them keep all the money and unlocked their account. This is doubtful since nobody has seen any of the accounts play all week.

2. AP seized all the funds but lied to us about it, keeping a nice chunk of change. Basically this makes them in on it.

3. AP makes some sort of deal with the cheat(s) to keep them quiet.

4. An AP insider was in on it and AP helped to cover it up.

5. AP was the cheat all along.

If AP really did not find anything then why have these accounts not been seen?

After I posted this another poster makes a great point saying that if these accounts have really been found not guilty wouldn't they have immediately come back to the tables since they have proven they can win hundreds of thousands of dollars a week? Obviously AP's response doesn't add up.
The Following User Says Thank You to pokeraddict For This Useful Post:
fatshaft (24th September 2007)