View Single Post
  #114 (permalink)  
Old 20th September 2007, 08:28 PM
pokeraddict's Avatar
pokeraddict pokeraddict is offline
Webmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 1,412
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 138
Thanked 469 Times in 237 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 2673
Rep Power: 46
pokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleSinner View Post
That response from AP shows one of two things:

1. They obviously have no idea what is going on. (And I wouldn't put it past their staff that this is the case)

2. They are involved in this scam which is why they havent "uncovered" anything.
Exactly. Anybody that has a clue at the very least sees the blatant HU chip dumping. It's not in AP's best interest to do anything here even if they are not involved.

Funny how calling the worst possible hand on the river for $1700 isn't odd. Also it's is not odd to call all in with T9 with no draws on the turn and just happen to run into the few hands you can beat without improving. What a joke.

What AP can do to convince us is show us hh's from endless times this player called ten high all in on the turn w/o any draws and lost and other situations where the players made smiliar plays but were not ahead.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pokeraddict For This Useful Post:
Pinababy69 (20th September 2007), Sedition (23rd September 2007)