View Single Post
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 3rd September 2007, 05:34 AM
SlotsWizard SlotsWizard is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 1,658
WTGs: 5
WTGd at 48 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 1,664
Thanked 1,555 Times in 774 Posts
Reputation Points: 8244
Rep Power: 59
SlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond repute
Thank you for the information and links, Paddy.

Does the following statement:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paddy View Post
It is this gaming software that the patent holder says violates his patent.
Imply that all casinos using Realtime Gaming software are violating the patent? Or is it because Bodog specifically didn't license something? Or is it not the casino software at all, but the sports/horses/etc. software which is the target of the lawsuit?
Reply With Quote