View Single Post
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 30th August 2007, 09:45 PM
SlotsWizard SlotsWizard is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 1,658
WTGs: 5
WTGd at 48 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 1,664
Thanked 1,555 Times in 774 Posts
Reputation Points: 8244
Rep Power: 59
SlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandMaster View Post
"Loose" is a perfectly good English verb and you can certainly loose something, the only problem is that at least 90% of the time people mean "lose" when they write "loose".
For people who don't speak English as their primary language, there are lots of "gotchas" when trying to learn English with similar-looking words, for example, lose and hose, bough and cough, brought and drought, etc.

It's a totally different situation when a native English-speaker uses "loose" in place of "lose", for example:

Quote:
I wouldn't have been a looser if the slots were a little loser.


Anywho, back to Bodog...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SlotsWizard For This Useful Post:
Nifty29 (31st August 2007)