|
They recorded the player as Fraudulent. This was nothing to do with chargebacks or player fees which is a different catagory.
I accepted that they remove the player to release thge funds on the other players that month.
I would assume that a site who promotes their high levels of security would automatically close a fraudulent account as would any legit site.
My funds were not released for the other players.
2 months later, the same player another $2000 fraud. Now this time was even stranger as the player had shown no activity on his account through april or may. On the day of payment (mid June) the player appears again added to May's active players. A $2000 fraud with no player activity on his account.
It look more like the full tilt affiliate team cooking the books to avoid releasing affiliate payments.
Not only this. They have not bothered to respond to any e-mails reguarding this issue. I would assume that if there was any irregular activity on an account they would at least offer an affiliate an explaination. The above message has been the only resonse or correspondance I have receivrd from them other that their daily promo spamming.
The above e-mail clearly indicates that they allow fraudulent account to continue. If it was a bot, It would have shown up by the level of rake. The rake generated from this player was only $37.40
The cost of his fraud was
$460 x 5 = $2300 in March
$400 x 5 = $2000 in May
The players fees/chargebacks were $32.68
Bonuses paid to player = $12
My total balance for this one player
(minus)$467.28 in March
(minus)$400 in May
Total balance = (minus) $867.28
Now I cannot come to a conclusion that makes Full Tilt anything other that a scam site. The fact that they do not bother to respond to my emails lead me to beleive that it is a scam on Full Tilts side. I highly doubt this player was indeed involved in fraudulent activity and if he was, Full Tilt are in breach.
Now as the player conducted a $2000 fraud in May and had no player activity . I can only come to the assumption that it was chip dumping. If he had already done this for $2300 on March and got caught, why was the account allowed to remain open 2 months after detection so he could do a further $2000 fraud on the same account?
|