Quote:
Originally Posted by vinylweatherman
Perhaps it is because Neteller are so damn keen to co-operate that the DoJ/IRS have simply "requested" a customer list, even though they have no basis in law to REQUIRE this. If Neteller fall for this in their eagerness to please, then the IRS can go fishing, and will probably catch something worth pursuing that they had no way of catching without the initial "bait" of a customer list. Once they have this "reasonable basis", they can then REQUIRE production of pretty much anything they want.
|
Perhaps. But I don't know why they would need that. Navigant should be finding out how much of the Neteller revenue derived from US players transfering funds to Internet Casinos. From that, there should be a fine.
The IRS fishing is something different. Neteller hasn't said anything about that. We should deduce that unless they are asked about specific individuals our records are secure. That's "should".
What I am suggesting is that US players make a concerted effort to ensure that is the case.
The other thing that is possible, is that those with frozen funds have had "their" remittance audited and to that extent personal information has been released. If that is the case, again - Just tell us. But I doubt that was necessary either.
I understand the mess. I don't understand the lack of communication.
Stanford.