View Single Post
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 2nd June 2007, 11:07 AM
Vesuvio's Avatar
Vesuvio Vesuvio is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,028
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 55
Thanked 193 Times in 98 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1212
Rep Power: 31
Vesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud ofVesuvio has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_balls View Post
from wikipedia:

"In general, "erotica" refers to portrayals of sexually arousing material that hold or aspire to artistic or historical merit, whereas "pornography" often connotes the prurient depiction of sexual acts, with little or no artistic value. The line between "erotica" and the term "pornography" (which is frequently considered a pejorative term) is often highly subjective. In practice, pornography can be defined merely as erotica that certain people perceive as "obscene." The definition of what one considers obscene can differ between persons, cultures and eras."

IMHO the bunnies hold historical merit therefore they are erotica rather than porn.
I guess it all just adds up to there being no real definition! The naked women at the casino aren't bunnies, just nondescript naked women, and they certainly don't have any artistic or historical merit

For me, "pornography" isn't pejorative. I've also seen elsewhere that "obscenity" is often a legal concept for what's considered unacceptable by law - so I don't think "obscene erotica" is a good definition.

I like the Greek origins of "pornography" - "writing about prostitutes"
Reply With Quote