View Single Post
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 2nd June 2007, 10:41 AM
Simmo!'s Avatar
Simmo! Simmo! is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Engerland
Posts: 7,254
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 72 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 1,070
Thanked 2,535 Times in 1,227 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 13408
Rep Power: 15
Simmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vesuvio View Post
Only nudity that's intended to "arouse" the viewers Playboy casino has the softest of soft porn, but it's still porn. Note that voting for that isn't the same as saying there's anything wrong with it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by tennis_balls View Post
IMHO the bunnies hold historical merit therefore they are erotica rather than porn.
There's an intersting observation in the latter, in that over the past few decades since Playboy started, public views on/acceptance of nudity and sexual content has been diluted. What one would have called porn in the 60's may be very different to today, and probably again in another 20+ years.

What was probably considered porn wayback, is considered less so in this day and age and less so in the future. This poll 20 years ago would have shown a very different result I'm sure. Where TV obviously diluted the effect during the 70s and 80s, I guess the Internet has a huge say in the attitude in more recent times.
__________________

++++ Online Casinos ++++ Online Slots ++++ USA Casinos (By State) ++++
++++ ++++


Reply With Quote