View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 31st May 2007, 02:39 PM
Da_Gambla Da_Gambla is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 137
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 74
Thanked 144 Times in 66 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 800
Rep Power: 12
Da_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vesuvio View Post
No, we disagree - I think it's soft porn. Lame (I think that's the word ) and innocuous, but still porn.
You're correct, as I did just go back and re-read your first offering attributing nudity to porn, sorry. I believe I had just read Bryan's post and somehow attributed his view to you by mistake.

Well, we then differ, but all I can say is that society overall treats them as two very different things.

An R rated movie with simple nudity: someone underage may go in with an adult (parent).

A NC-17 with more explicit nudity which usually also involves intense sexual situations: NO ONE under 17 allowed, perod.

MA or X: No one under 18, period.

So there are clear levels to each one, and as such, there is nudity almost everywhere you go. Anything that goes into the realm of porn is pretty much pushed underground here, stateside.

Just to clarify, please answer this... you have a movie where the actress quickly removes her top and bra, and then changes into a different blouse. You saw brief breast, definitely nipples, for about 2 seconds. You consider this pornographic? This film should be rated MA? Just curious to know where other's standards are...

- Keith
__________________
Just for fun, I'm trying out this new sig. Let me know what you think.
Reply With Quote