View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 31st May 2007, 12:06 PM
Da_Gambla Da_Gambla is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 137
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 74
Thanked 144 Times in 66 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 800
Rep Power: 12
Da_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vesuvio View Post
You really think the nudity at Playboy has no sexual tone Sure, it's nothing much in this day and age and I certainly don't mind it, but that's a crazy statement. Someone would lose their job at Playboy if it was true
You might need to re-read what I said. I never said the nudity in Playboy the magazine was non-sexual. I was surmising that the nudity (if any) at the casino would be non-sexual in nature; just plain ol' vanilla nudity.

But thanks for attempt number 14 at twisting my post and then labeling it 'crazy'. If you brushed up on your reading comprehension, I'm sure you would make qute a few less wild assumptions with people's posts.

If there is any simulated sex depicted at the casino, then I would stand misinformed. If not, my post stands as-is.

- Keith
__________________
Just for fun, I'm trying out this new sig. Let me know what you think.
Reply With Quote