View Single Post
Old 28th May 2007, 01:07 AM
indievertigo indievertigo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dundee
Posts: 14
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 40
Rep Power: 0
indievertigo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by XXLClubCasino View Post
Quick input, why would a rogue operator first pay a player and then initiate a neteller chargeback instead of "simply" not pay the player? This is of no benefit to a rogue operator it just cost them extra time an transfer charges.

Or does someone see a benefit in this new possibility? I think this is also the reason why we (I) never heard about this before.
I'm not sure, but it does mean that we now have to worry about them not charging back. Before the worry was up until one was paid. and I guess they could initiate a mass chargeback then shut up shop and disappear.
Reply With Quote