View Single Post
Old 27th May 2007, 02:49 AM
Da_Gambla Da_Gambla is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 137
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 74
Thanked 144 Times in 66 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 800
Rep Power: 15
Da_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to beholdDa_Gambla is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinababy69 View Post
Hey D_G, the part of the quote I highlighted above I thought addressed yours (and others) question/concern re: the Neteller issue? Maybe we are perceiving it differently? Don't take this to mean that I approve of what happened with the players having their money taken back from Neteller 2 weeks after the fact, because I don't. I'm just pointing out that I thought Josh answered the question.

As to his participation in this thread, at least he made an effort to participate, which is more than some do. Even if you don't approve of his posts and/or solutions, he put forth an effort. There are many reps on here who won't post publicly, ever. They'll communicate through PM, or through Bryan, but that's it. Again, just an observation.

I wish more would.
Pina, it is not acceptable that he won't put it into writing. That's where our perception differs, is all. He says that we will "just have to trust his decisions", and I don't accept that. I haven't heard that anybody does.

Josh has said that he will not raid a Neteller account unless fraud is involved. GrandMaster pointed out that Josh is not an independant arbitor or unbiased judge, so therefore how would this be fair? That's when Josh decided to post his "final" post.

Answer this, Pina... because maybe my mind can change if I understand how someone else views it. If Josh is promising NEVER to do this again, then why will he NOT put it in writing? Why do we, the players, have to TRUST HIM on word alone? If this is the case, we can just throw out ALL T&C's as they are all unnecessary. All casino managers should just decide on a whim for or against any particular issue and it's over.

I am very cautious and suspicious of anyone that will agree to something verbally, but REFUSES to add it in writing.

I will not recommend this casino in any shape or form until it is in writing.

- Keith
__________________
Just for fun, I'm trying out this new sig. Let me know what you think.
Reply With Quote