View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 19th May 2007, 03:32 AM
pangloss pangloss is offline
Less than Zero
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 86
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 10
Thanked 54 Times in 28 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: -17
Rep Power: 0
pangloss seems to be zero at this point
Same here - nothing, zilch, zero, not a whisper. And still affiliates are recommending this casino to play. I think there is a liability here at the affiliate level. Since the affiliate i signed up thru is located within my jurisdiction I am confident I sue the Casino concerned at my local court and join (attach) the affiliate to the action. Even if the offending affiliate is not found to be 100% responsible the Law here would oblige the affiliate to compensate me for 100% of my loss leaving the affiliate to recover the remainder direct from the casino.

A prime example of this wold be the Fortune Lounge situation where no affiliate on planet Earth could claim ignorance.

In this way affiliates would think twice about linking rouge casinos. And no links to rogue casinos would make the world a better place.

I think a test case is on its way.


...
Reply With Quote