View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 17th May 2007, 10:10 PM
pokeraddict's Avatar
pokeraddict pokeraddict is offline
Webmaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 1,411
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 138
Thanked 468 Times in 236 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 2668
Rep Power: 46
pokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond reputepokeraddict has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelawnet View Post
This seems somewhat problematic in that people search for casinos before playing, and if they read people's complaints on the forum, they might be better in a position to judge whether a casino is a good bet, so to speak.

It appears that the net effect of this is to reduce the effect of bad behaviour by casinos because much of it will be handled behind the scenes.

So it's less risky for casinos to rip-off players.

But the value of protecting the reputations of legit casinos is going to be a great result and I doubt any room is going to screw a player just because the players may not be able to post about it at Casinomeister. How do they really know if a player posts here, want to post here, knows about this place or will find it one day? If they are going to screw a player (or as in many cases just have a CS issue or misunderstanding) it is going to happen with or without this rule.
Reply With Quote