View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17th May 2007, 09:06 PM
Simmo!'s Avatar
Simmo! Simmo! is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Engerland
Posts: 7,074
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 71 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 1,052
Thanked 2,410 Times in 1,171 Posts
Reputation Points: 12778
Rep Power: 15
Simmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond reputeSimmo! has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelawnet View Post
This seems somewhat problematic in that people search for casinos before playing, and if they read people's complaints on the forum, they might be better in a position to judge whether a casino is a good bet, so to speak.

It appears that the net effect of this is to reduce the effect of bad behaviour by casinos because much of it will be handled behind the scenes.

So it's less risky for casinos to rip-off players.
But conversely, if they see a complaint by a more experienced player, they are more likely to take that seriously than one from a total newbie or bonus hunter who may/may not have fallen foul of the T&C's. I think also that one of the keys here is to allow Bryan to give more time to the more serious complaints and those from members who value the forum.

Where there is a potential downside however is that the experienced players know not to play the Cloud casinos of this world so they may be hidden from the limelight. It may be an idea to push the accredited & rogue casino sections more to compensate.
__________________

++++ OGGS.com Online Casino Reviews ++++ ++++


Reply With Quote