Quote:
Originally Posted by sweiger
Considering Zaqwert's info, I must say that this "heijac" is either ultra-über-extremely lucky, or something terribly fishy is going on...
|
I can not reveal the bet size-data from "heijac". But he was no low roller. So given the bet-size linear probability things are as they should be. Of course he also must have played a LOT.
The only thing 'fishy' is the reply from
RTG/InetNet. Their slots seems to be working like all other random jackpot slots out there.
The "heijac" data is just another strong indication for the liniear bet size, and one that is easy to understand.
If you have same chance as "heijac" of hitting the several jackpots over some months with 0.01$ bet, they you have a money machine. I believe we calculated earlier it only costs 7$ average/day to spin 24 hours at 0.01$ bet-size.
But only the 2 lowest of about 50 jackpots was won at 0.20$ bet. (and no lower bets won eighter.) So.....