View Single Post
Old 1st May 2007, 03:18 AM
Avatar73's Avatar
Avatar73 Avatar73 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 232
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 38
Thanked 71 Times in 51 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 377
Rep Power: 13
Avatar73 is just really niceAvatar73 is just really niceAvatar73 is just really niceAvatar73 is just really nice
No, it comes back to Zoozie and being linear.

So say betting $100 in one go gives you 1/10 chance of jackpot.

Then setting a computer on all night at 0.01 makes no difference....
assume it spins 10,000 times, wagereing $100. Then overall, you would still have 1/10 chance of hitting the jackpot.

The only difference is that with one type you have one stab at 1/10 chance, and the other method you have 10,000 stabs at 1/100,000 chance.

So theres no real difference.

(aside from the fact that 0.01c spins will be less volatile, and per extra $100 range the chance of not hitting the jackpot will decrease with smaller bet size).


It's a bit like saying.... you can buy 500,000 lottery tickets for a 1M prize, or bet $500,000 on red on no-zero. Both can win the same, but with higher, smaller bets, the chances are a lot more clear cut!
Reply With Quote