View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 24th April 2007, 11:15 PM
sdaddy's Avatar
sdaddy sdaddy is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 442
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 180
Thanked 211 Times in 108 Posts
Reputation Points: 1213
Rep Power: 22
sdaddy has much to be proud ofsdaddy has much to be proud ofsdaddy has much to be proud ofsdaddy has much to be proud ofsdaddy has much to be proud ofsdaddy has much to be proud ofsdaddy has much to be proud ofsdaddy has much to be proud ofsdaddy has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandMaster View Post
You may not like UIGEA or how it was passed, but it seems to be within the power of Congress to pass such a law. The CDA fell foul of that thing in 1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech". There is no constitutionally protected right to gamble.
Yes, the UIGEA doesn't limit freedom of speech, but I do think it infringes on my privacy rights by instructing US banks to monitor and limit my financial transactions related to online gambling, even though such transactions may not be illegal according to the Wire Act or laws within my state.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sdaddy For This Useful Post:
dominique (25th April 2007), jetset (25th April 2007), lots0 (25th April 2007)