Thread: Neteller, the DOJ, and the IRS
View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 13th February 2007, 02:38 PM
winbig's Avatar
winbig winbig is offline
This is why cats hate ppl
  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,223
WTGs: 29
WTGd at 208 Times in 53 Posts
Thanks: 1,002
Thanked 2,728 Times in 1,580 Posts
Nominated 6 Times in 4 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 14127
Rep Power: 117
winbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond reputewinbig has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to winbig Send a message via MSN to winbig Send a message via Yahoo to winbig
Quote:
Originally Posted by REOdeathwagon View Post
Withdrawals - Deposits = Net winnings

I would doubt the burden of proof is on the IRS. I would think that the burden of proof falls on the taxpayer?
Who's to say that they used Neteller solely for depositing and withdrawing?

And you're right. It's the taxpayers duty to prove otherwise...

America: Guilty until proven innocent.
__________________
New - The complete Las Vegas Site & Forum
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to winbig For This Useful Post:
eduun (17th February 2007)