
25th January 2007, 09:17 AM
|
 |
(((Eminence Grise)))
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tamarack Forest
Posts: 3,741
WTGs: 300
WTGd at 314 Times in 59 Posts
Thanks: 4,044
Thanked 2,618 Times in 1,394 Posts
Nominated 3 Times in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 13572
Rep Power: 105
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by winbig
Another article about it:
http://www.onlinecasino.org/news/cas...oogle-1500.php
and
http://www.onlinecasinonews.com/ocnv...e.asp?id=12673
If the latter is true, the DoJ definitely had a voice in the matter, strong arming Yahoo & Google.
I'm sure we'll hear more about it today.
If this is true:
For them to ban online gambling searches, but not porn searches is a DISGRACE. They cite "underage" people being led to gambling by popups. What about these "underage" people being led to PORN via popups? Which is more common? You decide.
One is just as bad as another.
Oops, maybe I shouldn't give them anymore ideas.
Or how about these pedophiles searching for illegal child porn sites? Why aren't they doing about searches for keywords such as those? As it is now, they only remove a listing if it's reported for having illegal content.
|
Bush and his cronies totally out of control and running loose rampantly....refer back to this post:
http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...tml#post143064
|