View Single Post
Old 18th September 2006, 09:23 AM
Zoozie's Avatar
Zoozie Zoozie is offline
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,075
WTGs: 22
WTGd at 44 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 701
Thanked 1,207 Times in 383 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 6545
Rep Power: 54
Zoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond reputeZoozie has a reputation beyond repute
The most logical and fair solution would be that chance for hitting the jackpot is proportional to the bet size. (Ie. liniar function).

This way payout% is the same for all bet-sizes and small bets can win the big jackpot also. I like this the most.

Another solution is that you only win a part of the jackpot. (Ie a 1$ bet would win 20% of the jackpot where as a 5$ bet would win 100%). This is also a fair solution and chance for hitting the jackpot is now the same for everyone (though jackpot size differs).

Unfortunately neighter of the cases seem to apply at RTG casinos.

You could argue that due to the huge house edge at slots it would be fair that high rollers faces a smaller house egde. And this is also the case in Vegas. But this is for different slots. Ie. playing quarter slots compared to $ slots.

When it happens for the same slots I feel low rollers get cheated but only because RTG do not tell players that. (Nor publish any payout% records for that matter).

Zoozie
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zoozie For This Useful Post:
trips to win (27th April 2007)