|
This doesn't look good. I don't see how the casino can rely on a statement that players were notified in a follow-up e-mail of the incorrect terms.
If I understand this right, this e-mail stating that the original terms were incorrect is supposed to have been sent just after the original invitation. If so, why on Earth were the original terms allowing blackjack repeated in the e-mail confirming the bonus had been credited??? If I'm wrong, and this phantom e-mail only went out after the e-mail confirming the bonus, then that's too late. The bonus had been given under the original terms, and it's unlikely that a player would check their e-mail again between receiving the confirmation and starting to wager.
Either way, this is a serious mistake and I can't see any reason to justify voiding this player's cash-in. Screwing up something like this is unacceptable - for every player who comes here, how many are there that don't know about sites like this, and simply never see their money?
|