View Single Post
Old 30th July 2006, 06:33 AM
SlotsWizard SlotsWizard is offline
Webmeister
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North of Antarctica
Posts: 1,658
WTGs: 5
WTGd at 48 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 1,664
Thanked 1,558 Times in 774 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 8259
Rep Power: 64
SlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond reputeSlotsWizard has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky21
The fact is that at the moment this is a very grubby unregulated industry, hosted buy countries that are obviously on the side of the casino due to the huge licence fees they pay, so to call for it to be banned until this is sorted out is a fair call i think, wait to you have a problem with these casinos, there is very little recoarse avaliable when they decide to make rules up as they go along ... a b&m casino is a far better bet than online underfunded unregulated junk that is out there.
The proper solution is not to ban the industry, but to regulate it. It's not fair to deny responsible gamblers the right to play simply because a couple people can't control their finances.

If the industry were properly regulated, there WOULD be recourse if a casino didn't pay up. The regulating authority could step in, pay the player, make the casino owner reimburse the regulating authority, and if they refuse to do so then they should have their license revoked and/or their ass thrown in jail.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SlotsWizard For This Useful Post:
yameater (3rd August 2006)